From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA32713 for caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 23:17:09 +0200 (MET DST) Resent-Message-Id: <200004152117.XAA32713@pauillac.inria.fr> Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA03758 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:16:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ike203.zip.com.au [61.8.10.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA18579 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:16:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from maxtal.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA07986 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 05:16:18 +1000 Sender: root@localhost.localdomain Message-ID: <38F76E80.73D16F60@maxtal.com.au> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 05:16:16 +1000 From: John Max Skaller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry? References: <38E7F364.5D24BB7C@motorola.com> <14572.49274.910966.673172@cylinder.csl.sri.com> <38ED71B6.30118608@motorola.com> <14574.1721.508470.790475@cylinder.csl.sri.com> <38F270CF.221F5BD0@motorola.com> <20000411195808.62154@pauillac.inria.fr> <38F3D520.9CD19485@motorola.com> <20000412192711.J12487@jaune.inria.fr> <38F5EA86.5910DBF6@maxtal.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-From: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 23:17:08 +0200 Resent-To: caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr One barrier to acceptance of ocaml in industry: lack of programmers. This requires training. Who can help? -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net