From: Max Skaller <maxs@in.ot.com.au>
To: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@ontil.ihep.su>
Cc: Francois Pottier <Francois.Pottier@inria.fr>,
caml-list@inria.fr, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr,
caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:52:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38FE62F9.BA484599@in.ot.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004191839100.15184-100000@ontil.ihep.su>
Vitaly Lugovsky wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Francois Pottier wrote:
>
> > May I advocate Jean-Christophe Filliâtre's excellent literate
> > programming tool, ocamlweb?
> >
> > http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/ocamlweb/
> >
> > It nicely turns your O'Caml source code into a TeX document,
> > including an identifier index. Comments are expected to contain
> > TeX source.
>
> But stupid "industry" don't like TeX. :(
> They wants HTML or somthing like that. Is there any HTML output
> formatter for ocamlweb? Industry knows nothing about literate
> programming, as well as about many other progressive technologies.
Industry is not stupid, it is simply governed by different motives.
I'm using
a) ocaml -- an advanced programming language
b) interscript -- an advanced literate programming tool
in my job.
--
John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd]
mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au -- at work
mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au -- at home
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-20 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-17 12:57 FALCON Gilles FTRD/DTL/LAN
2000-04-17 15:35 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-04-18 5:54 ` Francois Pottier
2000-04-19 14:53 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2000-04-19 15:17 ` Claude Marche
2000-04-20 1:44 ` Max Skaller
2000-04-20 3:01 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2000-04-21 0:41 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-04-21 19:35 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-21 20:53 ` Michael Hohn
2000-04-25 10:50 ` Remi VANICAT
2000-04-20 1:52 ` Max Skaller [this message]
2000-04-20 3:08 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2000-04-20 2:51 ` Max Skaller
2000-04-20 17:17 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-04-20 12:45 Gerd Stolpmann
2000-04-21 19:56 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-22 18:30 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2000-04-23 3:20 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-17 22:24 bdb-as-camluser
2000-04-03 1:27 Dennis (Gang) Chen
2000-04-06 16:51 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2000-04-07 5:27 ` Dennis (Gang) Chen
[not found] ` <14574.1721.508470.790475@cylinder.csl.sri.com>
2000-04-11 0:24 ` Dennis (Gang) Chen
2000-04-11 17:58 ` Pierre Weis
2000-04-12 1:45 ` Dennis (Gang) Chen
2000-04-12 17:27 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2000-04-13 15:40 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-14 19:16 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-12 18:06 ` David Brown
2000-04-13 1:23 ` Dennis (Gang) Chen
2000-04-13 14:36 ` Pierre Weis
2000-04-13 6:53 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2000-04-13 12:20 ` Frank Atanassow
2000-04-13 17:28 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-13 12:28 ` Steve Stevenson
2000-04-13 13:38 ` jean-marc alliot
2000-04-13 16:00 ` William Chesters
2000-04-13 14:29 ` T. Kurt Bond
2000-04-13 17:23 ` Julian Assange
2000-04-16 16:33 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-17 15:06 ` Markus Mottl
2000-04-17 19:55 ` John Prevost
2000-04-24 2:36 ` Chris Tilt
2000-04-13 16:59 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-15 22:29 ` William Chesters
2000-04-16 22:24 ` Nickolay Semyonov
2000-04-18 6:52 ` Max Skaller
2000-04-17 12:51 ` jean-marc alliot
2000-04-17 17:49 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-17 22:34 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-19 15:31 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-19 18:30 ` Michael Hicks
2000-04-20 16:40 ` Markus Mottl
2000-04-20 17:58 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-20 18:52 ` Markus Mottl
2000-04-21 20:44 ` Michael Hohn
2000-04-21 19:22 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-21 19:09 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-21 19:45 ` Markus Mottl
2000-04-21 19:56 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-21 19:18 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-18 10:53 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-04-19 15:57 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-13 7:05 ` Pierre Weis
2000-04-13 17:04 ` Julian Assange
2000-04-07 15:44 ` John Max Skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38FE62F9.BA484599@in.ot.com.au \
--to=maxs@in.ot.com.au \
--cc=Francois.Pottier@inria.fr \
--cc=Pierre.Weis@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr \
--cc=vsl@ontil.ihep.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).