From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA18549 for caml-red; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 23:04:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA21055 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:24:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ppp198.dyn146.pacific.net.au [210.23.146.198]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eAUCO7f11541 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:24:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from ozemail.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA03678; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:21:00 +1100 Message-ID: <3A26462C.F8AEFA3F@ozemail.com.au> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:21:00 +1100 From: John Max Skaller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sven LUTHER CC: Mattias Waldau , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: sorting of list of vectors (array with one dimension) References: <3A2603CF.698A368D@ozemail.com.au> <20001130124754.A14873@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Sven LUTHER wrote: > why not use a associative map or something such instead of a list of vectors ? Performance. -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net