From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA13177 for caml-red; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:35:45 +0100 (MET)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA20022 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:15:55 +0100 (MET)
Received: from dux.ru (ns.dux.ru [193.125.210.65])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f0DDFsH28100
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:15:54 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dux.ru (8.8.8/8.7.6/DUX) with UUCP id OAA20350 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:24:27 +0300 (MSK)
Received: (qmail 1514 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2001 21:46:25 -0000
Received: from softdnserror (HELO snob.spb.ru) (snob@192.168.200.3)
  by softdnserror with SMTP; 12 Jan 2001 21:46:25 -0000
Message-ID: <3A5F780E.B263DC50@snob.spb.ru>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:33:02 +0300
From: Nickolay Semyonov <snob@snob.spb.ru>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
References: <3145774E67D8D111BE6E00C0DF418B663AD720@nt.kal.com> <20010111194916.B4332@pauillac.inria.fr> <3A5F7685.FF2593BB@snob.spb.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

Nickolay Semyonov wrote:
 
Xavier Leroy wrote:
 
 > Shall we "do it right" (for some notion of "right") or favor
 > interoperability?  Hard question.  My current answer is to
 > procrastinate...  Actually, multi-byte encoded strings (UTF-8) are
not
 > so bad and already have full support in OCaml :-)
 >
 
 Er, where? Am I missed something?
 
 Nickolay