From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA27409 for caml-red; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:13:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA01008 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:04:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (cartman97.zip.com.au [61.8.20.225]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f15H4s906851; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:04:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from ozemail.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA08593; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:01:31 +1100 Message-ID: <3A7EDC6B.9A4A2E08@ozemail.com.au> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 04:01:31 +1100 From: John Max Skaller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "Michel.Mauny@inria.fr" , "caml-list@inria.fr" Subject: Re: Consortium Caml References: <200102031630.LAA63508@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Francisco Reyes wrote: > Two levels of membership is probably best. Actually, I'd consider three levels: add a level for individuals. The contribution should be enough to cover administrative overheads, the main communal benefit would be the existence of a 'registry' of serious Caml users. Such a list would help us to know each other, and also help to convince management that there really is more than one Caml programmer in the world :-) -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net