From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Indexed and optional arguments (was Future of labels)
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 04:23:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AD34FAF.9EB5E288@ozemail.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010409173310F.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> > In this way, we have only strict commuting label mode, but we can still
> > use positional notation via sugar.
> This is already the case :-)
If that is so, then provided libraries contain no labels,
all existing 'classic' Ocaml code will continue to work in
strict commuting label mode.
In particular, no 'classic' ocaml user will notice
any difference: only 'classic mode' users who played with
some labels (and probably expected to get burned by
further changes anyhow). Is that right?
--
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net
download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-11 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-29 0:44 [Caml-list] Future of labels Jacques Garrigue
[not found] ` <AAEBJHFJOIPMMIILCEPBEEFHCHAA.mattias.waldau@abc.se>
2001-03-29 6:43 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-03-29 11:44 ` Mattias Waldau
2001-03-29 17:52 ` Mattias Waldau
2001-03-29 8:22 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-29 9:46 ` Markus Mottl
2001-04-09 1:28 ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-09 8:33 ` [Caml-list] Indexed and optional arguments (was Future of labels) Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-10 18:23 ` John Max Skaller [this message]
2001-04-09 8:45 ` [Caml-list] Future of labels Markus Mottl
2001-04-10 18:42 ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-10 22:01 ` Markus Mottl
2001-03-29 12:53 ` Judicael Courant
2001-03-30 3:42 ` [Caml-list] Implicit parameters (was Future of labels) Jacques Garrigue
2001-03-30 7:55 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AD34FAF.9EB5E288@ozemail.com.au \
--to=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).