From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
To: Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com>
Cc: Mark Seaborn <mrs35@cam.ac.uk>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] two unrelated questions
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 10:03:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AEF4ED3.3A3C62E0@ozemail.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105011343400.11466-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
Brian Rogoff wrote:
> > It's a pity there is no such destructor for a Hashtbl.
> > [All C++ STL data structures have read iterators, which
> > amount to destructors]
>
> Are they really the same? I think of STL style iterators as being more
> similar to array indices, and arrays (and hashtables) are not defined
> inductively like lists, trees, and graphs, etc.
Well, for an iterator p, there are three operations:
*p
p++
p==q
But they're usually combined like:
*p++
which is equivalent to getting one element of the container p denotes,
and adjusting p to denote the rest of the container.
> As I'm sure you know, there is an easy enough transformation from
> hashtables (and arrays) to lists, like the following
>
> let pairs_of_hashtbl ht =
> let pl_ref = ref [] in
> let fn a b = (pl_ref := (a,b)::(!pl_ref) in
> (Hashtbl.iter fn ht; !pl_ref)
Sure, but this requires building a new data structure.
Even if that is OK for traversal, it can't handle mutating
operations.
Of course, people don't use STL algorithms as much in C++
as they might, because there is no support for nested anonymous
functions (lambdas) or currying, which are essential for localisation.
And of course Ocaml is _good_ at that :-)
--
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net
download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-02 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-25 21:08 Chris Hecker
2001-04-26 0:38 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-04-26 6:04 ` Judicaël Courant
2001-04-26 12:06 ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-27 9:12 ` Anton Moscal
2001-04-29 22:24 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-04-30 18:57 ` Fergus Henderson
2001-05-01 1:31 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-05-01 12:45 ` [Caml-list] " Ken Friis Larsen
2001-04-27 15:09 ` [Caml-list] " Brian Rogoff
2001-04-27 17:49 ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-26 8:22 ` Andreas Rossberg
2001-04-26 1:13 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-26 13:47 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-04-26 22:34 ` Chris Hecker
2001-04-26 16:57 ` Mark Seaborn
2001-04-26 22:20 ` John Max Skaller
2001-05-01 21:08 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-05-01 23:30 ` John Max Skaller
2001-05-02 0:03 ` John Max Skaller [this message]
2001-05-01 17:25 Dave Berry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AEF4ED3.3A3C62E0@ozemail.com.au \
--to=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
--cc=bpr@best.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mrs35@cam.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).