From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA09321; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:52:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA09320 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:52:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from versailles.inra.fr (versailles.inra.fr [138.102.70.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5Q8qW523505 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:52:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from versailles.inra.fr (mig151 [138.102.65.151]) by versailles.inra.fr (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA16256 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:52:31 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B384C94.599503D7@versailles.inra.fr> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:49:24 +0200 From: Antoine Marin Organization: INRA X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2smp i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] splitting ocaml-list References: <20010625140205.A61802@caddr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Miles Egan a écrit : > > Would it make sense to split up caml-list into a few new lists? A lot of other > language projects offer three lists, a devel list, an announce list, and a users > list. For ocaml, this would be: > > caml-announce: > announcements of new versions of ocaml and ocaml-related packages > caml-devel: > discussion of ocaml bugs and internals > caml-users: > general questions about ocaml usage and problems > > Such a division might make it easier for people to ask newbie questions without > troubling the core ocaml team. I don't think, just because usually they are included this way: caml-announce is included in caml-users that is included in caml-devel Developpers should know everything that is said on each list (anyway they can filter e-mails). It's the reverse way, core ocaml team won't trouble newbie with obscure metaphysic thought ;) regards, Antoine ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr