From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA27628; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:00:30 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA27587 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:00:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([61.8.18.253]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f6EF0QD04331 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:00:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from maxtal.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA06396 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 01:00:25 +1000 Message-ID: <3B505E89.6B28980E@maxtal.com.au> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 01:00:25 +1000 From: John Max Skaller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info References: <3B4FA8C2.57FCDD80@maxtal.com.au> <3B4FB5BA.81AB2866@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk "Alexander V. Voinov" wrote: > And in general, redundancy is certainly not an ontological evil when it > is properly structured. Otherwise we wouldn't make any use of poetry. More generally, we know that Ocaml ISN'T properly structured. If we knew it were, there'd be no point doing research :-) -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 New generation programming language Felix http://felix.sourceforge.net Literate Programming tool Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr