caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Christians <achrist@easystreet.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] License Run-Time Question
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 12:13:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B87F8EE.8E1F6062@easystreet.com> (raw)

I have just started with OCaml by installing and building the 
source with Cygwin under NT.  With some guesswork, I guess I've
got it working, and I'm much impressed so far.  

Given that, I want to start using OCaml and, if I do, some 
executables from code I write in OCaml might start showing up 
on my clients'/customers' machines, and I want to be sure I'm not 
breaking any licenses.  From what I see in the archives, I'm not 
supposed to have any problems distributing executables, but I'm
not sure of the specifics of how I stay in compliance doing 
this.

In the archives I see this (199912/msg00026.html):

  >> If you write code in O'Caml, the license doesn't impose 
  >> anything on your software's license.  The LGPL license on 
  >> the runtime might force you to ensure that your program is 
  >> physically separate from the runtime so that the runtime can 
  >> be  replaced by your customers if they so desire, but this 
  >> says nothing  about the license under which your software is 
  >> distributed.

Is there any documentation available on what to include when I 
try to distribute an executable program written with OCaml, and 
how to do it so that I'm in compliance with all the relevant 
licenses?  In particular, I will probably want to distribute 
executables that come out of ocamlopt.

How do I keep the program 'physically separate'?

As I have the cygwin version of ocamlopt working, will the 
programs also need CygWin run-time dll(s)?  Which one(s)? Are 
there additional license problems distributing binaries because 
I'm using Cygwin to make my programs? 

The alternative to cygwin is MS.  I have MSVC++ v6, but not the
MS assembler.  I don't even know how much the assembler would
cost.  I'd probably buy that if I needed it when revenues are
up, but they aren't. Is that the way to go if I want to minimize
worries about license problems?

Thanks in advance much for any info.


Al Christians
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


             reply	other threads:[~2001-08-25 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-25 19:13 Al Christians [this message]
2001-08-27 15:12 ` Xavier Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B87F8EE.8E1F6062@easystreet.com \
    --to=achrist@easystreet.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).