From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA21302; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:30:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA21358 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:30:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f8R9UOT21344 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:30:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from htec.demon.co.uk ([62.252.168.19]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010927093019.JPGE15984.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@htec.demon.co.uk> for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:30:19 +0100 Message-ID: <3BB2F29D.DA3E1C57@htec.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:34:21 +0100 From: Chris Quinn X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CAML LIST Subject: [Caml-list] C callbacks and threading... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi list, The manual says a caml function can be registered and then used from the C runtime. Is this still true if called from a thread not created from within Caml ie. via the Thread module? I have vague recollections of caml's thread system involving some bookkeeping which probably rules this usage out. Can anyone say? Thanks, Chris Q ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr