From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA31094; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 21:37:24 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA30894 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 21:37:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA24988 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:49:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from postfix2-2.free.fr (postfix2-2.free.fr [213.228.0.140]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f9AGni105175 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:49:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from sbuilders.com (nas-cbv-6-10-26.dial.proxad.net [213.228.10.26]) by postfix2-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D36F5FB92; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:48:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3BC49730.28AE6FB@sbuilders.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 20:45:04 +0200 From: Maxence Guesdon Reply-To: max@sbuilders.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bcpierce@cis.upenn.edu, caml list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc References: <15204.1002728341@saul.cis.upenn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > (** comment for f *) > val f : t > > val f : t (** comment for f *) > > val f : t > (** comment for f *) > > without the need for any funny markers. A simpler way is : if no blank line separates the comment and the element, then they're associated. What's the need for indentation ? BTW, I still don't buy the possibility to put comments after AND before. -- Maxence ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr