From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA27583; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:42:37 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA27544 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:42:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from gwsmtp.thomson-csf.com (gwsmtp.thomson-csf.com [195.101.39.226]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fATDgUT19941 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:42:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from thomplex.thomson-csf.com (200.3.2.2) by gwsmtp.thomson-csf.com (NPlex 5.1.053) id 3C05575C00014227 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:46:53 +0100 Received: from thomplex.thomson-csf.com (200.3.2.2) by thomplex.thomson-csf.com (NPlex 5.1.036) id 3C01DF6800080AAD for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:39:09 +0100 Received: from bgxplex3.bgx.airsys.thomson-csf.com (1.38.9.153) by bgxplex.bgx.airsys.thomson-csf.com (NPlex 5.1.053) id 3C0507F500003A9A for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:42:14 +0100 Received: from fr.thalesgroup.com (187.150.3.12) by bgxplex3.bgx.airsys.thomson-csf.com (NPlex 5.1.053) id 3BFE75E800008576 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:47:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3C063B4B.9AA263B6@fr.thalesgroup.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:42:35 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant Organization: There is no cabal, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml References: <20011129093210.A19619@pauillac.inria.fr> <20011129105008.DEBFD25A1B@suburbia.net> <20011129135059.A24529@pauillac.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Xavier Leroy wrote: > This last claim seems to be an excessive simplification of what's in > the LGPL. At any rate, I maintain that what I'm proposing ("this is > distributed under the conditions of the LGPL with the special > exception that ...") is perfectly OK. The GNAT project does exactly Yes, you have perfectly the right to do that. Of course, the license can no longer be called LGPL since it has been modified. --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr