From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA13542; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:07:31 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA14107 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:07:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA06255 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:57:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from julie.univ-savoie.fr (univax.univ-savoie.fr [193.48.120.32]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g14FvP105680; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:57:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from post.bourget.univ-savoie.fr (post.bourget.univ-savoie.fr [193.48.120.73]) by julie.univ-savoie.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id QAA46487 ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:57:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from univ-savoie.fr (www.lama.univ-savoie.fr [193.48.123.134]) by post.bourget.univ-savoie.fr (8.12.0.Beta7/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id g14FvJXt008137 ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:57:19 +0100 Message-ID: <3C5EAF65.88151205@univ-savoie.fr> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:57:25 +0100 From: Christophe Raffalli X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-9mdksmp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel de Rauglaudre CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) References: <9BE7FA48-1771-11D6-A336-003065BDAA76@ece.ucsb.edu> <15454.38553.300800.53941@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20020204155242.B2338@verdot.inria.fr> <20020204150839.GE14738@chopin.ai.univie.ac.at> <20020204164154.D2338@verdot.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Daniel de Rauglaudre a écrit : > > Hi, > > > Otherwise, even if the revised syntax (or an even better one) could be > > considered superior, nobody will ever use it if it isn't the standard. > > It has no chance to become the standard if nobody wants to use it... > > There are very few users interested in the revised syntax. How much do > you estimate the chances that people will accept a major change of the > syntax? > > You want my opinion? 0% > > .......... > I generally agree with that. But it there a tool to convert an OCaml program from one syntax to another ? I would not mind changing the syntax of my 20000 thousand lines program named PhoX, if there was a tool to do it cleanly (with good indentation, even for part of the code with very long phrase hard to indent) > -- > Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE > daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr > http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ > ------------------- > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr -- Christophe Raffalli Université de Savoie Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03 fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42 mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr