From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA12268; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:12:41 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA13072 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:12:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from escargot.exelixis.com (shaker.exelixis.com [65.209.203.254]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g16JCcT16048 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:12:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from quasar.ipa.nw.ru (dhcp-172-29-16-196.exelixis.com [172.29.16.196]) by escargot.exelixis.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/GNAC-GW-2.1) with ESMTP id LAA26637; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:12:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3C617F37.196A3710@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 11:08:39 -0800 From: "Alexander V. Voinov" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Rogoff CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax foo References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi All, Brian Rogoff wrote: > Caml syntax is *not* why people like Caml. ...................... I agree completely. I would have been using Caml much more than I am if I felt myself comfortable with the syntax. Alexander ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr