From: "Robert Fischer" <RFischer@RoomAndBoard.com>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:13:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D1E4D9CA9BCE04D8F2B55F203AE4CE30666AB87@selma.roomandboard.com> (raw)
Performance of Ocaml's bytecode is slower than F#? Really?
~~ Robert.
-----Original Message-----
From: skaller [mailto:skaller@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:54 AM
To: Robert Fischer
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 07:33 -0600, Robert Fischer wrote:
> >> After all, Java and C# aren't intended to be used like that, yet they
> >> certainly have wide-spread adoption.
> >
> > They don't make binary shared libraries
> > because the architecture is a virtual machine driven by
> > bytecode .. they DO make dynamically linkable bytecode
> > libraries.
> >
> As long as you play within the bounds of their VM. This is no different than Ocaml.
Performance is different :) That's why I use Ocaml native code
exclusively, which doesn't support dynamic loading (yet :)
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-09 14:13 Robert Fischer [this message]
2007-03-09 15:21 ` skaller
2007-03-09 17:26 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 18:50 ` Jon Harrop
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-09 17:41 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:35 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 14:21 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 13:33 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 13:49 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:54 ` skaller
2007-03-08 21:26 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 0:04 ` skaller
2007-03-09 10:06 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:25 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-10 14:55 ` Richard Jones
2007-03-10 22:07 ` Michael Vanier
2007-03-29 0:33 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-29 8:41 ` Joel Reymont
2007-03-30 11:31 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 1:13 Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 1:49 ` [Caml-list] " Jim Miller
2007-03-08 2:52 ` skaller
2007-03-08 3:00 ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08 3:10 ` skaller
[not found] ` <beed19130703071919g1f537f59o93ce06871fba8f3a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-03-08 3:27 ` skaller
2007-03-08 3:36 ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08 21:16 ` Richard Jones
[not found] ` <45F10E90.5000707@laposte.net>
2007-03-09 7:43 ` Matthieu Dubuget
2007-03-10 14:58 ` Richard Jones
2007-03-08 12:22 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-03-08 14:24 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 20:34 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-09 10:22 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:45 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08 2:12 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-03-08 11:12 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-03-08 11:59 ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-08 12:43 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 21:28 ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-09 0:14 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D1E4D9CA9BCE04D8F2B55F203AE4CE30666AB87@selma.roomandboard.com \
--to=rfischer@roomandboard.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).