From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF5EBC69 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:41:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.roomandboard.com (mail.roomandboard.com [66.84.219.55]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l29HfYqr001065 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:41:35 +0100 Received: from selma.roomandboard.com ([192.168.101.46]) by mail.roomandboard.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:41:33 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:41:33 -0600 Message-ID: <3D1E4D9CA9BCE04D8F2B55F203AE4CE30666AB9D@selma.roomandboard.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing Thread-Index: Acdici3A7KUjxIEgT3OiazDKyrG2ZQ== From: "Robert Fischer" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2007 17:41:33.0941 (UTC) FILETIME=[2DE95A50:01C76272] X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45F19C4E.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 bytecode:01 ocaml:01 ocamlopt:01 ocaml:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 frog:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 slower:01 slower:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 bin:01 Weird -- I thought F# was having all kinds of performance problems. Got = metrics? ~~ Robert. -----Original Message----- From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr]On Behalf Of Jon Harrop Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:26 AM To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing On Friday 09 March 2007 14:13, Robert Fischer wrote: > Performance of Ocaml's bytecode is slower than F#? Really? Performance of OCaml compiled to native code with ocamlopt is sometimes = slower=20 than F#, so yes. --=20 Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs