From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA30910; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:03:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA30757 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:03:53 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from athlon.baretta.com (r-mi214-6a224.tin.it [62.211.4.224]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g95I3o501248; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:03:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from baretta.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.baretta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E0827246; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:13:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D9F2BE3.9050304@baretta.com> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 20:13:55 +0200 From: Alessandro Baretta Organization: Baretta srl -- www.baretta.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: it, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel.Mauny@inria.fr, Daniel de Rauglaudre , Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 (Was: Pattern matching and strings) References: <200210041514.RAA0000017577@beaune.inria.fr> <3D9DEE21.7040604@baretta.com> <20021005083451.A28645@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005124734.GA606@iliana> <20021005144259.C28897@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005134133.GB8321@quincy.inria.fr> <20021005154711.C29870@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005140918.GA9357@quincy.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Michel Mauny wrote: > Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote/écrivait (Oct 05 2002, 03:47PM +0200): > >>On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:41:33PM +0200, Michel Mauny wrote: >> >> >>>As a consequence, let me repeat that Camlp4 is still part of the OCaml >>>distribution, as all of you noticed. >> >>Michel Mauny gave here his personnal point of view, > > > Well, the sentence you quote looks more like a fact, to me. > I am terribly sorry to have restarted this latent flame-war on the status of CamlP4. I hope the best for the evolution of the language--including such powerful extensions as a CamlP4, and shame to me for not having learned it yet. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners