From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA31789; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:49:48 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA31515 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:49:47 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from mail.fltrp.com ([211.101.185.130]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g9FDnjD01546 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:49:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fltrp.com [129.0.5.6] by mail.fltrp.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AC4F287010C; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:46:55 +0800 Message-ID: <3DAC1C98.8080104@fltrp.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:48:08 +0800 From: Yang Shouxun User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; zh-CN; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-cn MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Problem with ocamlc and recursive and parametrized classes References: <3DAAA035.6020809@inrialpes.fr> <3DAAA5BF.9010901@inrialpes.fr> <3DAB3E82.6050600@baretta.com> <3DABC510.5010801@inrialpes.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Frederic Tronel wrote: >To close the thread, I should mention that the compilation eventually >ends up in almost an hour. So the compiler was not locked in an >endless loop. I had this feeling. According to my experience, if your OCaml program runs too slow, that's an indicator of bad algorithm or implementation (for instance, you intend to use a good-enough algorithm, but your implementation is faulty due to oversight), rather than bad compiler implementation, unless you can narrow the problem down and provide a reproducible case for the rest of list to review. >In fact, my question was rather is there any improvements about this > >"problem" integrated in the CVS for example. As said above. Best! shouxun ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners