From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA05341; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:57:44 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA09046 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:57:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns.sunet.ru (ns.sunet.ru [217.174.96.14]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g9HHvfD17901 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:57:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ahome.ru (217-174-98-88.dial.sunet.ru [217.174.98.88]) by ns.sunet.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA67512; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:57:36 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from gleb@ahome.ru) Message-ID: <3DAEFA0A.8A3F8A8E@ahome.ru> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:57:31 +0400 From: "Gleb N. Semenov" Reply-To: gleb@ahome.ru, semenov@jet.msk.su Organization: @Home X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: ru, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerd Stolpmann CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK with Ocaml 3.06 (fwd) References: <20021014181602.GA2620@iliana> <200210142038.WAA05623@pauillac.inria.fr> <20021014210719.GA3682@iliana> <20021014224457.GM1002@ice.gerd-stolpmann.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > > Am 2002.10.14 23:07 schrieb(en) Sven LUTHER: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:38:36PM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote: > > > [...] [...] > > It is very difficult to do this nicely without an integrated > > distribution. Mmm, maybe it can be done, but would need lot of work, and > > anyway, inria don't has the vast multi arch build farm that debian has, > > so i don't know if it would be meaningfull. > > Just a few phenomenons that are hard to tackle : > [...] > > These are not exoctic complications that are rarely found, they are normal. > A reasonable source distribution format must deal with them, and there must > be people willing to create such enhanced source packages. I don't say > this is all impossible, but sure it is an ambitious project. > > Gerd Little comment. Yes, all said is almost true. But perl people had solved the same problem with Makefile.PL included in any source distributuon of perl modules, hadn't them? Regards! GNS -- Gleb N. Semenov 111621, Muromskaya St. 21, apt. 2, Moscow, Russia gleb@ahome.ru phone +7(095)700.0172 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners