From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA30460; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:27:45 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA30905 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:27:39 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from athlon.baretta.com (host77-68.pool80116.interbusiness.it [80.116.68.77]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gA48Rc509316 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:27:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from baretta.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.baretta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B972724F; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:07:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3DC62ACA.5020001@baretta.com> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:07:38 +0100 From: Alessandro Baretta Organization: Baretta srl -- www.baretta.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: it, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lauri Alanko , ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] module namespace References: <20021102002456.GC8925@rashko> <3DC39206.5080504@baretta.com> <20021102161015.GB1082@rashko> <3DC3FEA5.3020300@baretta.com> <20021102223735.GA1237@la.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Lauri Alanko wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:34:45PM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > >>"http://priv.baretta.com/afo", >>"http://priv.baretta.com/lib", >>"http://priv.baretta.com/svg". > > > Pardon, but I at least don't find it particularly intuitive to find the > name of a network protocol in every namespace identifier. Domain and > path, yes. > > > Lauri Alanko > la@iki.fi I agree with you, but unless we agree that any resource or documentation available on the defined namespace can be reached via http at the specified address/path, then we must specify the protocol. Choosing http as a standard protocol for acessing documentation is definitely reasonable now, but in the future other protocols might emerge and dominate the scene. I'm willing to go with "xxx.domain.com/path" if there is some consensus about this form of namespace identification. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners