From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA16623; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:59:08 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA17695 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:59:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from orcaware.com (bdsl.66.12.233.174.gte.net [66.12.233.174]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAQ6x5104999; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:59:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from orcaware.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by orcaware.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAQ6wv76024605; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 22:58:57 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE31BD0.1C7C6C88@orcaware.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 22:59:28 -0800 From: Blair Zajac X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1rfacHe4WNh5,x-ns2U100btwUq5f MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sven Luther CC: Xavier Leroy , Caml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Submitting patches to Ocaml References: <3DDEC932.6B3C74C@orcaware.com> <20021125111155.A14115@pauillac.inria.fr> <3DE26C26.EFB8043A@orcaware.com> <20021126064418.GA1126@iliana> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:29:58AM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote: > > Xavier Leroy wrote: > > > Bugzilla has a reputation of being awfully hard to install. Other bug > > > tracking systems are better alternatives. Jitterbug (what we > > > currently use) is indeed simplistic, but fits our needs well. > > > > I've installed it several times on different sites and it wasn't > > particularly hard. And comparing it to writing a GC, it seems > > simple :) But it does take a while. > > In my understanding, and from the few times i had interaction with > bugzilla, in its gnome incarnation, it really is not as nice as you > think it is : I've looked at several BTS and decided to use it at several different companies for internal use, so I've been quite happy with it. The first thing I noticed browsing the Caml bugs was that there was no mention of who categorized the bugs and who wrote any comments in response to the bugs. I always find this good info to have when browsing bugs. > o you have to create an account. With an account you get to attach your email address to a particular bug if you want to watch it. I've done with with one bug on Mozilla that I've been waiting forever to finish (uploading bookmarks, history, etc), and don't have to subscribe to a mailing list to see it's progress. > > o you cannot use a mail interface. True. > > Both of these are possible with the ocaml BTS, and altough it would be > nice to have some feedback when the bug report is processed, it works > rather nicely, without the added complexity of bugzilla, which will, in > my opinion, add more confusion than other thinks. I think each BTS has things that others are missing. Having used Bugzilla in many projects, I've come to look for those pieces of information. Best, Blair -- Blair Zajac Plots of your system's performance plots - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners