From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA01521; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:30:13 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA01508 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:30:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from pots.cmguc.com ([208.248.239.78]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h03FUAr28071; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:30:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from cmguc.com ([10.239.68.244]) by pots.cmguc.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.0.52-EA) with ESMTP id ABV00661; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 10:27:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E15AC23.3EF2932C@cmguc.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:28:35 -0500 From: Erol Akarsu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sven Luther CC: Chet Murthy , Xavier Leroy , onlyclimb , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] speed References: <3E15B3B3.3040106@163.com> <20030103143221.B29601@pauillac.inria.fr> <200301021752.h02HqPXh005051@nautilus-chet.watson.ibm.com> <20030103145340.GA2819@iliana> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi All, What is the best way to access to huge Java libraries created so far from ocaml? I am looking for efficient way, easy-to-write wrappers. I am actually intersted in accessing to Web services utilities , RDF parsers and some multiagent libraries all written java. Thanks Erol Akarsu Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:52:25PM -0500, Chet Murthy wrote: > > > > Not to contradict Xavier, because in essence, he is right -- Caml is > > indeed far faster than Java on any realistic applications in almost > > any area I have ever bothered to try -- but the story as to Java is > > actually rather complicated. > > > > (1) different JDKs exhibit remarkably different results on real-world > > examples, as their implementors have different backgrounds. I > > remember that the first JITs all did great on integer and > > floating-point loops, and that was _it_ -- the rest of the time, they > > were often slower than just a hack like inlining interpreter > > code-segments. This is just a human thing. > > Do you have any idea how gcj does, compared to ocamlopt maybe ? After > all, if i am not wrong, both generate native code. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners