From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA16722; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:17:50 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA16752 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:17:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from athlon.baretta.com ([213.255.109.130]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2QGHmX20910 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:17:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from baretta.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.baretta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55351273BB for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:23:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E81D3F1.5090302@baretta.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:23:13 +0100 From: Alessandro Baretta Organization: Baretta srl -- www.baretta.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: it, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ocaml Subject: [Caml-list] Multithreading and marshalling Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; alessandro:01 baretta:01 marshalling:01 marshalled:01 alex:01 bytecode:01 segmentation:01 data:03 faults:10 between:12 there:16 accessing:17 previous:20 upon:78 version:21 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Is there any known quirk between multithreading (bytecode version) and marshalling? I ask because after adding multithreading support to xcaml I have started to get segmentation faults upon accessing data marshalled to disk by a previous execution of xcaml. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners