From: Karl Zilles <zilles@1969.ws>
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
Cc: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>,
Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin <snob@snob.spb.ru>,
caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] single-line comment request
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 11:49:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E9319B5.7090905@1969.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030408110617.0389bde8@localhost>
Chris Hecker wrote:
> There's really no downside that I can see to supporting them besides
> minor backwards compatibility (but hey, if you want to port back, just
> write an editor macro to convert them since you argue they're so easy!
> :), using another token, and somebody has to go implement them. There
> are many minor upsides, including a bunch that haven't been listed like
> avoiding questions about this topic on the list, and matching people's
> intuition from C++, etc. It seems like a clear win to me.
I agree. Clearly this is not *needed*, but it is something I have found
myself wishing for. Something simple to type would be nice. I find
(**) to be a little acrobatic for my fingers. (I can imagine I will be
mocked for complaining about this).
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-08 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-08 12:56 Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 15:17 ` Samuel Lacas
2003-04-08 14:27 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 16:21 ` Samuel Lacas
2003-04-09 15:15 ` Thierry SALSET
2003-04-08 15:19 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 14:25 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 16:08 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 15:38 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 17:42 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 17:31 ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-08 16:29 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 19:26 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2003-04-08 20:22 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 21:37 ` Michal Moskal
2003-04-08 17:13 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 19:23 ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-08 18:49 ` Karl Zilles [this message]
2003-04-08 19:04 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 21:57 ` Daniel Andor
2003-04-08 22:07 ` Michal Moskal
2003-04-08 22:09 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-10 2:59 ` cashin
2003-04-10 7:58 ` [Caml-list] { ... } vs ( ... ) vs begin ... end Frederic van der Plancke
2003-04-08 19:42 ` [Caml-list] single-line comment request Daniel M. Albro
2003-04-08 18:53 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2003-04-08 18:19 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 22:40 ` Joshua Scholar
2003-04-13 19:46 ` Andreas Rossberg
2003-04-13 22:57 ` Daniel M. Albro
2003-04-08 19:53 ` Jeff Henrikson
2003-04-08 20:31 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-13 14:07 ` John Max Skaller
2003-04-08 15:28 ` Damien
2003-04-08 14:49 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-04-08 15:39 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-08 15:45 ` malc
2003-04-08 15:45 ` Samuel Lacas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E9319B5.7090905@1969.ws \
--to=zilles@1969.ws \
--cc=brian.hurt@qlogic.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=checker@d6.com \
--cc=snob@snob.spb.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).