caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Geer <ben@socialtools.net>
To: brogoff@speakeasy.net
Cc: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>, "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] does class polymorphism need to be so complicated?
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:19:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F43BBB8.9090806@socialtools.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308200941050.7047-100000@grace.speakeasy.net>

brogoff@speakeasy.net wrote:
> The extension of Brian's code to rows with more than one field is obvious 
> though, isn't it? 
> 
> type fbbq = 
>   <foo: int->int; bar: unit->string; baz: unit->bool;quux: unit->unit>
> 
> class thing_processor = 
>   object 
>     method do_something (o : fbbq) =  
>       (* do something that calls all those methods *)
>     method do_something_else (o : fbbq) =  
>       (* do something else that calls all those methods  *)
>   end

Unless I've missed something, this only works if none of the classes of 
type fbbq have any additional methods.  Here's an example that doesn't work:

type fbbq =
   <foo: int->int; bar: string; baz: bool; quux: unit > ;;

class thing x_init =
    object (self)
      val mutable x = x_init
      method foo y = x + y
      method bar = string_of_int (self#foo 2)
      method baz = (x = 1)
      method quux = print_string (string_of_int x)
  end;;

class extra_thing x_init =
    object (self)
      inherit thing x_init
      method quuux = self#quux; self#quux
  end;;

class thing_processor =
   object
       method process (obj : fbbq) =
	obj#quux;
	print_string (string_of_int (obj#foo 1));
	print_string obj#bar;
	print_string (string_of_bool obj#baz)
   end ;;

let et = new extra_thing 1 ;;
let tp = new thing_processor ;;
tp#process et ;;

The call to 'process' produces the following error:

This expression has type
   extra_thing =
     < bar : string; baz : bool; foo : int -> int; quuux : unit; quux : 
unit >
but is here used with type
   fbbq = < bar : string; baz : bool; foo : int -> int; quux : unit >
Only the first object type has a method quuux

So this approach doesn't fit the requirement, which is to be able to use
a derived class anywhere its base class can be used.

Ben

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-20 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-20 15:42 Benjamin Geer
2003-08-20 16:05 ` Brian Hurt
2003-08-20 16:19   ` Richard Jones
2003-08-20 16:25   ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-20 17:09     ` brogoff
2003-08-20 17:25       ` Jacques Carette
2003-08-20 23:34         ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-21 13:27           ` Jacques Carette
2003-08-20 18:19       ` Benjamin Geer [this message]
2003-08-20 20:39         ` brogoff
2003-08-20 21:04           ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21  0:28             ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-21  8:17               ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21  8:58                 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-21  9:38                   ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21 11:44                     ` Remi Vanicat
2003-08-21 13:11                       ` Richard Jones
2003-08-21 16:41                         ` Remi Vanicat
2003-08-21 18:04                     ` brogoff
2003-08-21 20:20                       ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21 23:35                         ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-22  3:59                           ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-22  7:12                             ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21 13:38                   ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21  0:58             ` brogoff
2003-08-20 23:40           ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21  1:29             ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-08-21  9:19               ` Benjamin Geer
2003-08-21 18:44               ` Chris Clearwater
2003-08-20 20:43   ` Issac Trotts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F43BBB8.9090806@socialtools.net \
    --to=ben@socialtools.net \
    --cc=bhurt@spnz.org \
    --cc=brogoff@speakeasy.net \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).