From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA21489; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:36:39 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA14144 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:36:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rabelais.socialtools.net (rabelais.socialtools.net [81.2.94.243]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h8C8abf07882 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:36:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix, from userid 108) id EC99E2331E; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:36:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from socialtools.net (chaucer.socialtools.net [81.2.94.242]) by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2002331D; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:36:35 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3F618590.3050406@socialtools.net> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:36:32 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, fr, it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] eliminating shift/reduce conflicts References: <20030912082632.GA9048@imperium.ph> In-Reply-To: <20030912082632.GA9048@imperium.ph> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA, X_ACCEPT_LANG version=2.54 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.54 (1.174.2.17-2003-05-11-exp) X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 rafael:01 'dido':01 foo:01 foo:01 wrote:03 sevilla:03 parse:04 benjamin:07 element:11 shift:11 conflicts:13 easier:13 rules:18 ben:80 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla wrote: > I however have some rules that > need to be prefixed by either a single FOO or a foo_list It might be easier to always parse a foo_list, even if it only contains one element. Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners