From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA24910; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:22:07 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA24768 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:22:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from rabelais.socialtools.net (rabelais.socialtools.net [81.2.94.243]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hB7BM5100009 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:22:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix, from userid 108) id 022D923327; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:22:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from socialtools.net (chaucer.socialtools.net [81.2.94.242]) by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01C0232DA; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3FD30D59.2000706@socialtools.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:22:01 +0000 From: Benjamin Geer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, fr, it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Cannasse Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Object-oriented access bottleneck References: <871xrhe4hb.fsf@iki.fi> <002201c3bc6e$195e49e0$0274a8c0@PWARP> In-Reply-To: <002201c3bc6e$195e49e0$0274a8c0@PWARP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on rabelais.socialtools.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bottleneck:01 cannasse:01 inlining:01 nicolas:01 closure:01 modules:02 wrote:03 benjamin:07 enough:12 offer:86 handle:14 ben:80 ben:80 far:20 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > For most of the cases, modules should be powerful enough and offer far > better performances... and inlining. > Even if you need some specialisation, you can always handle it using a > closure. Could you give an example? Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners