From: David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Marie Gaillourdet <jmg@gaillourdet.net>
Cc: jtbryant@valdosta.edu, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future?
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:50:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d13dcfc050624055027743339@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d13dcfc050624023670d3aed2@mail.gmail.com>
[ Last email, I swear it! ;-) ]
Hello,
2005/6/24, David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com>:
> Anyway, INRIA people have already worked on those issues and had
> proposals. It is just that they feel it was not worth the trouble, *at
> that time*:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=doligez+parallel+GC+caml-list&hl=fr&lr=&selm=fa.dlqoshv.1a66ho7%40ifi.uio.no&rnum=2
>From private and public emails, it appears that I have fed an old troll.
My intent is not to start another thread about GC and threading. My
intent is to know how, in a short future, I could efficiently use a
moderately SMP machine by writing pure OCaml code.
It could be with typed channels between unix processes, by modifying
the GC, by using concurrent constructs within the language, ... I
don't know so this is why I'm asking it here.
Yours,
d.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-23 7:21 David MENTRE
2005-06-23 8:33 ` [Caml-list] " Frédéric Gava
2005-06-23 9:28 ` David MENTRE
2005-06-23 17:20 ` Jonathan_T_Bryant
2005-06-24 8:52 ` Jean-Marie Gaillourdet
2005-06-24 9:36 ` David MENTRE
2005-06-24 12:50 ` David MENTRE [this message]
2005-06-24 16:14 ` Jonathan_T_Bryant
[not found] ` <1119630886.18424.1.camel@calaf.rn.informatics.scitech.susx.ac.uk>
2005-06-24 17:02 ` Jonathan_T_Bryant
2005-06-24 16:59 ` Eric Stokes
2005-06-24 18:25 ` XDR and ASN.1 (was: Re: [Caml-list] How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future?) David MENTRE
2005-06-24 22:46 ` [Caml-list] How INRIA people envision OCaml's parallel future? Erik de Castro Lopo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d13dcfc050624055027743339@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.mentre@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=jmg@gaillourdet.net \
--cc=jtbryant@valdosta.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).