caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David MENTRE <david.mentre@gmail.com>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:16:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d13dcfc050830001671d0974f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508292333.59714.jon@ffconsultancy.com>

Hello,

2005/8/30, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>:
>  I had tried lablgtk before but failed to get to grips with it. 

The client of my application is also written in Lablgtk2 and, despite
helpful answers by Jacques Garrigue and Olivier Andrieux as well as
SooHyoung Oh's tutorials, I find programming with Labgtk2 not very
easy (to say the least). I find Lablgtk2 is largely under-documented.
Of course, this is a large task that cannot be achieved by two
individuals.

> I think it would be more constructive to create a decent cross-platform GUI
> library from the ground up for FPLs/OCaml. This wouldn't need to be anything
> fancy, just easy access to the simplest GUI elements to start with. I'd like
> to see GUIs described by purely functional data structures. 

I'd also loved too. Having a cross-platform GUI (with native look and
behaviour on Windows and MacOS X),   programmed using a functional
style, well documented (with reference manual and tutorial) and with
necessary tools (GUI design application) would be very very helpful.

However this is a huge task. To add on your initial question:
  1. do you think a minimal part of the OCaml community could
aggregate to ensure the long term maintainability of the toolkit?

  2. how to have a modern look (with whatever definition you might
find for it) which *is* a discriminant point when choosing a GUI?

  3. how to respond to toolkit's users that need to have more "exotic"
widgets/systems?

Yours,
david


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-30  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-28 15:38 Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
     [not found] ` <aefe758210f7fa0b9846b0ea4278cf3a@rouaix.org>
2005-08-28 23:21   ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-29 22:33 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30  4:39   ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 11:39     ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-30 11:48     ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 12:22       ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:45         ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 15:47           ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 16:08             ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-01  4:25               ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:20                 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:26                   ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 14:09                 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 16:21           ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-08-30 17:47           ` [Caml-list] " David Thomas
2005-08-30 18:06             ` Tyler Eaves
2005-08-30 19:01             ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:55               ` Chris Campbell
     [not found]               ` <c22844d10508301553b54841b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-30 22:56                 ` Fwd: " Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 23:04                   ` Doug Kirk
2005-08-31  0:08                   ` Fwd: " Jon Harrop
2005-08-31  0:31                     ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-08-31  8:48               ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-31  9:06                 ` Proposal a GUI from Ocamlsdl Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-31 14:39                   ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 19:27                     ` Nathaniel Gray
2005-08-31 14:27                 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Jon Harrop
2005-09-01  4:49                 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:15                   ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-09-01 13:28                     ` David MENTRE
2005-09-01 13:50                       ` skaller
2005-09-01 14:43                     ` Chris Campbell
2005-09-02  7:40                     ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-09-02 12:39                       ` skaller
2005-09-03 10:34                         ` Damien Bobillot
2005-09-03 12:30                           ` skaller
2005-09-04 14:08                           ` Richard Jones
2005-09-03 11:10                         ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-03 11:30                           ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-09-03 17:23                           ` Doug Kirk
2005-09-04 14:01                         ` Richard Jones
2005-09-01 19:23                 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Nathaniel Gray
2005-09-01  4:31             ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
2005-09-01  4:17       ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:25         ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30  7:16   ` David MENTRE [this message]
2005-08-30  9:53     ` GUI for OCaml Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-30 10:28       ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:04         ` Bünzli Daniel
2005-08-30 17:13         ` David Thomas
2005-08-30 11:18       ` Mark Shinwell
2005-08-30 14:22       ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-30 23:12         ` Pietro Abate
2005-08-30 14:14     ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Richard Jones
2005-08-30 15:33       ` mmzeeman
2005-08-30 15:44         ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:34         ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-01  4:58           ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 16:01       ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 16:25         ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:49           ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 16:03       ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:31     ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-31  8:19       ` About Lablgtk2 (was: e: GUI for OCaml) David MENTRE
2005-09-03 11:41         ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 17:35   ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Olivier Andrieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d13dcfc050830001671d0974f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.mentre@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).