From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.mentre@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254D7BC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri,  4 Sep 2009 07:52:26 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtQBAKNHoErRVdzekGdsb2JhbACafz8BAQEBCQkMBxMDrSyQKAEDAgSEFwWIfw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,330,1249250400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="45998402"
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2009 07:52:25 +0200
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so419792fxm.9
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ikHV9ysCHPFd6K0Rh1eJ4qPYI71cFAHYJHozurtGexM=;
        b=nFu57njMf389BHUlqPFYYXpp7fOOgvaWIhtHuBKRm8s0eqSftbaclgTmr4tuQyv2mE
         pumERuCQR4aRHW2c2wkpTMIsZ5a+Bks9t2wmJQ5fBetAkRu3bRi+nd4xnNFrnAD5GlV3
         OI8epKNU67eusMHPgq9aJP8qRbmFMhhZ30Pa0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=oDwkwh7JRc3rFf6Hs5iM+BBUFlijJtWbNYJWsPtUIS8zAJsez4uWIGAzuFYTtTUtW3
         l5BNGLN2T5yK+0Kg0vZMQqMBLsYpYVyqAIGMXYJhpJbvo2XCUdYO8EkhBRWCXZNzF2Rg
         ga9XuY+UF/csGaeYcn+adM2GT6bomCQdyn38A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: david.mentre@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.152.204 with SMTP id h12mr8681475bkw.97.1252043545104; 
	Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090904133445.c7fa5ad6.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
References: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> <20090904133445.c7fa5ad6.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
From: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:52:05 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a803f45d83a2a6c2
Message-ID: <3d13dcfc0909032252p5b1ed55fu1f3e9f9dbd3c6f7f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries?
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 2009:98 ubuntu:98 ubuntu:98 caml-list:01 repository:03 debian:04 debian:04 erik:04 erik:04 probably:07 batteries:91 batteries:91 push:08 

Hello Erik,

2009/9/4 Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>:
> If batteries is available for 9.10

Batteries is available for 9.10:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=batteries

> and I like it enough I will probably
> grab the 9.10 source package and backport it to 6.06 and 8.04 and then
> push it into our personalised Ubuntu package repository.

Here is the official Debian package used in Ubuntu:
  http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/ocaml-batteries.html

Yours,
d.

PS: List of OCaml packages in Debian and Ubuntu:
 http://bentobako.org/ubuntu-ocaml-status/raw/compare-unstable-karmic.html