From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
To: Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@abc.se>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Obsessed by speed
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:44:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010521094234.027bbb70@shell16.ba.best.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAEBJHFJOIPMMIILCEPBIEBBCLAA.mattias.waldau@abc.se>
>3. Would ocamlopt benefit from a peephole optimizer of
> the assembler code? Or is the assembler code already
> optimal?
I have seen lots of cases where a peephole optimizer (or a very special case ocamlopt optimizer that recognizes certain idioms) would help. For example, lots of loops seem to keep any integers tagged even if they are only used inside the loop, and the asm untags them every time they're used.
Chris
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-21 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-16 11:16 [Caml-list] ocamlopt and Windows DLL Dmitry Bely
2001-05-18 19:51 ` [Caml-list] Obsessed by speed Mattias Waldau
2001-05-21 16:44 ` Chris Hecker [this message]
2001-05-21 19:12 ` William Chesters
2001-05-27 8:47 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-05-31 15:13 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of the ocaml compiler Peter Ronnquist
2001-05-31 15:15 ` Peter Ronnquist
2001-05-31 16:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-01 2:30 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computingof " John Max Skaller
2001-06-01 4:10 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of " Tom _
2001-06-01 4:20 ` Niall Dalton
2001-06-01 6:33 ` [Caml-list] SISAL (Was: report describing optimization of numerical computing...) Florian Hars
2001-06-01 22:22 ` Tom _
2001-05-31 15:15 ` [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of the ocaml compiler Peter Ronnquist
2001-05-22 17:10 ` [Caml-list] ocamlopt and Windows DLL Dmitry Bely
2001-05-28 14:53 ` Dmitry Bely
2001-05-28 15:29 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4.3.2.7.2.20010521094234.027bbb70@shell16.ba.best.com \
--to=checker@d6.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mattias.waldau@abc.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).