From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA05303; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:25:31 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA05296 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:25:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pltn13.pbi.net ([64.164.98.22]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f62GPSb20585; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:25:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from checkerlap.d6.com ([64.163.212.190]) by mta8.pltn13.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GFU00LGXTIXYY@mta8.pltn13.pbi.net>; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 09:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 09:21:36 -0700 From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Where does Ocaml spend all the time? In-reply-to: <20010702151649.A32562@pauillac.inria.fr> X-Sender: def6@shell16.ba.best.com To: Xavier Leroy , Florian Hars Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010702091918.03d707f0@shell16.ba.best.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20010628120229.B25747@hars> <20010628101635.A25747@hars> <20010628103724.A11414@pauillac.inria.fr> <20010628120229.B25747@hars> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >It's for programs that allocate a lot. A C or C++ program with the >same allocation behavior would typically spend 50 to 90% of its time >in malloc() and free() :-) Except you can actually control when C allocates memory, as opposed to OCaml. ;) Just stopping by this thread to cause trouble, Chris ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr