From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA10314; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:35:33 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA10567 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:35:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net (smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net [216.133.226.135]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fB3LZMn14563; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:35:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from checkerlap.d6.com (node-d8e9cca2.powerinter.net [216.233.204.162] (may be forged)) by smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13780; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:35:19 -0800 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011203133617.02c29100@arda.pair.com> X-Sender: checker@arda.pair.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 13:37:16 -0800 To: Pierre Weis , mattias.waldau@abc.se (Mattias Waldau) From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Beware of compare (and Ocaml beaten by Java) Cc: xavier.leroy@inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200111300912.KAA13319@pauillac.inria.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk At 10:12 AM 11/30/01 +0100, Pierre Weis wrote: >I would be extremely interested at having a look at your collegue's >Java code. You may have used slightly different algorithms that could >explain the observed behaviour ... >Could you please send us the Java code ? I'd be interested in a short report on this if anybody has the time to write one up to the list. Was there a different algorithm, or was it an actual performance difference? Chris ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr