From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA19613; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:21:27 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA15194 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:21:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from plinky.bolt-action.com (node-d8e9cca3.powerinter.net [216.233.204.163]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g16MLNT18503; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:21:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from checkerlap.d6.com (node-d8e9cca2.powerinter.net [216.233.204.162]) by plinky.bolt-action.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g16MO0W29685; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:24:00 -0800 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020206141341.00cd4100@arda.pair.com> X-Sender: checker@arda.pair.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 14:14:13 -0800 To: Daniel de Rauglaudre , caml-list@inria.fr From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 "vs" JSE In-Reply-To: <20020206155900.J31521@verdot.inria.fr> References: <8E31D6933A2FE64F8AE3CC1381EEDCE7232D99@NT.kal.com> <8E31D6933A2FE64F8AE3CC1381EEDCE7232D99@NT.kal.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >> the "related work" section. They say that because Camlp4 is >> grammar-based, it can't guarantee parseability. Is this true, or did >> they not understand Camlp4 properly? >Yes, Camlp4 works with syntax trees, not with text. What does that mean, "can't guarantee parseability?" Chris ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr