From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA01184; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:54:59 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01203 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:54:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g5T6sv528877 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:54:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 46168 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2002 06:54:55 -0000 Received: from adsl-host-sf-228.apexworld.net (HELO checkerlap.d6.com) (66.114.212.228) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2002 06:54:55 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 66.114.212.228 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020628234621.0346fbb0@mail.d6.com> X-Sender: checker@mail.d6.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:47:14 -0700 To: Nicolas FRANCOIS (AKA El Bofo) , Caml List From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Objects or modules ? In-Reply-To: <20020629031458.4d0c7fe9.nicolas.francois@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >Do you think this plan is correct ? Should I translate it to objects ? Is >there some drawbacks using modules or objects ? This presentation by Xavier will get you started answering this question: Objects and classes versus modules in Objective Caml http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/talks/icfp99.ps.gz Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners