From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA27744; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 00:37:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA27503 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 00:37:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g6QMbDD19864 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 00:37:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 60855 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 22:37:12 -0000 Received: from node-d8e9cca2.powerinter.net (HELO checkerlap.d6.com) (216.233.204.162) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 22:37:12 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 216.233.204.162 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020726153129.02ac9100@mail.d6.com> X-Sender: checker@mail.d6.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:33:06 -0700 To: Michael Vanier , caml-list@inria.fr From: Chris Hecker Subject: wanted features (was: Re: [Caml-list] Bigarray map & set/get (long)) In-Reply-To: <200207260544.g6Q5iRb24346@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020725105657.024dbef0@mail.d6.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020724194422.028aa970@mail.d6.com> <20020719.155940.19123621.Christophe.Troestler@umh.ac.be> <20020719.155940.19123621.Christophe.Troestler@umh.ac.be> <20020722113136.A10720@pauillac.inria.fr> <4.3.2.7.2.20020724194422.028aa970@mail.d6.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020725105657.024dbef0@mail.d6.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >Could you give an example? I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this. By which? Views? http://www.google.com/search?q=views+pattern+matching+abstract+data+types Chris At 22:44 7/25/02 -0700, Michael Vanier wrote: > > Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:11:08 -0700 > > From: Chris Hecker > > > > [*] My current list of needed/wanted language features: > > > > 1. operator overloading/generics for making math less ugly and painful > > 2. module recursion > > 3. views for pattern matching abstract data types > > > > I added views to my want-list relatively recently (6 months ago?) as I > > started trying to do more interesting stuff. I can't believe the conflict > > between wanting to pattern match like you're supposed to in ml and wanting > > to abstract data types like you're supposed to in ml doesn't get more > > attention in the functional programming community. It seems like a > glaring > > problem, but maybe I'm missing something. > > > >Could you give an example? I'm a bit fuzzy on what you mean by this. > >Mike >------------------- >To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr >Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ >Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners