From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA15353; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:19:43 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA15846 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:19:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g8B7Jf110046 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:19:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 57147 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 07:19:39 -0000 Received: from adsl-host-sf-228.apexworld.net (HELO checkerlap.d6.com) (66.114.212.228) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 07:19:39 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 66.114.212.228 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020911001812.045bc660@mail.d6.com> X-Sender: checker@mail.d6.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:19:09 -0700 To: artboreb@netscape.net (Arturo Borquez) From: Chris Hecker Subject: RE: [Caml-list] eval order and 'and' Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <57C8A9DF.126A17DD.00958B05@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > >Does "let a and b in" guarantee a is evaluated before b, like "let a in let > >b in" does? >Sorry but I don't understand the purpose of your question. I was simply asking if the 'and' construct guarantees order or not (is a "sequence point" in C terminology), that's all. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners