From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA12259; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:19:53 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA08453 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:19:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g9FLJpD12473 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:19:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 52656 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 21:19:50 -0000 Received: from node-d8e9cca2-sfo-onnet.worldcom.com (HELO checkerlap.d6.com) (216.233.204.162) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 21:19:50 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 216.233.204.162 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021015141908.03520b78@mail.d6.com> X-Sender: checker@mail.d6.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:20:11 -0700 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] monomorphic restriction or typing/scanf bug? In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20021015135925.033299e8@mail.d6.com> References: <200210151219.OAA28770@pauillac.inria.fr> <200210150329.g9F3TAX26896@plinky.bolt-action.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >Excellent, that's a fine workaround for my case! Actually, I just realized that I didn't need the explicit type declaration on there at all. Hmm, I could have sword there was some case like this where I needed it with printf et al. Oh well. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners