From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA20319; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:57:56 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA22166 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:57:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id gA2Gvp520865 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:57:51 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 39019 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2002 16:57:46 -0000 Received: from arda.pair.com (HELO compaqreview.d6.com) (209.68.1.133) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2002 16:57:46 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.1.133 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021102085542.03796c88@localhost> X-Sender: checker@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:57:29 -0800 To: Alessandro Baretta , "Yurii A. Rashkovskii" , ocaml From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] module namespace In-Reply-To: <3DC3FEA5.3020300@baretta.com> References: <20021102002456.GC8925@rashko> <3DC39206.5080504@baretta.com> <20021102161015.GB1082@rashko> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >proposal would be to use such namespace ids as Com.Baretta.VSG, >Com.Baretta.Lib and Com.Baretta.Afo. There's nothing wrong with this, but >it is much less intuitiva and comprehensible than >"http://priv.baretta.com/afo", "http://priv.baretta.com/lib", >"http://priv.baretta.com/svg". This latter schema allows for the >identification of a URL -- in this case a private one on an intranet -- >associated with the project. Further, such a schema allows for multiple >versions of the same sw -- i.e. a private alpha such as the above, and a >public release -- to coexist without interfering with each other. I think his proposal would be Com.Baretta.Priv.Afo, etc., so multiple versions would work fine. I'm not giving an opinion on the matter (haven't thought about it), just pointing out that I assumed his 'grammar' for the namespaces was recursive. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners