From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id DAA25076; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 03:46:37 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA25073 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 03:46:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id gAE2kZ116937 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 03:46:35 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 62263 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 02:46:34 -0000 Received: from arda.pair.com (HELO compaqreview.d6.com) (209.68.1.133) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 02:46:34 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.1.133 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021113184428.030a3a38@localhost> X-Sender: checker@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 18:45:58 -0800 To: Jacques Garrigue From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] labels and optional arguments in 3.06 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20021114100554Q.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> References: <200211132333.gADNXON14954@plinky.bolt-action.com> <200211132333.gADNXON14954@plinky.bolt-action.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >val f : ~a:float -> ?a:float -> float -> float Why would this even be legal? Is there some reason to allow multiple labels with the same name? Is there a problem with the behavior I want without duplicate labels? Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners