From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA27036; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 07:11:54 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA26933 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 07:11:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id gBN6Bqn11544 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 07:11:52 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 99158 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2002 06:11:50 -0000 Received: from arda.pair.com (HELO compaqreview.d6.com) (209.68.1.133) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2002 06:11:50 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.1.133 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021222220900.0403a648@localhost> X-Sender: checker@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 22:10:06 -0800 To: "Harry Chomsky" , "Gurr, David \(MED, self\)" From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: ocaml w32 list? RE: [Caml-list] lablGL + cygwin Cc: In-Reply-To: <005b01c2aa45$692457d0$0200a8c0@harry> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >As long as the volume of >messages on the subject remains manageable, I think it's a bit silly to >worry that non-Win32 subscribers will be annoyed by the content of those >messages. Uninterested, perhaps, but we hardly need a separate list for >each topic that some users might be uninterested in. I agree with this sentiment. I don't think it's a problem on this list yet. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners