From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA21874; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:13:21 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA22644 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:13:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id h2QJDDf03232 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:13:13 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 99691 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2003 19:13:11 -0000 Received: from arda.pair.com (HELO compaqreview.d6.com) (209.68.1.133) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2003 19:13:11 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.1.133 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030326110515.035919b0@localhost> X-Sender: checker@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:08:45 -0800 To: Sven Luther , Alessandro Baretta From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Cc: Sven Luther , Ocaml In-Reply-To: <20030326113856.GA4522@iliana> References: <3E818E08.2000505@baretta.com> <3E81640C.40009@baretta.com> <20030326083345.GA2985@iliana> <3E816C13.7040507@baretta.com> <20030326105006.GA3891@iliana> <3E818E08.2000505@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam: no; 0.00; hecker:01 checker:01 caml-list:01 camlimages:01 labltk:01 chris:01 alex:01 face:98 thread:02 module:03 argument:03 bunch:03 differences:04 namespace:04 seems:05 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I think this thread is a misunderstanding masquerading as an argument. Alex, I think people (well, I do at least :) want to hear what the differences between a namespace and the module system are. It seems on the face of it that fixing pack's implementation would solve the namespace problem (this was Sven's thought as well), but you don't think so (or think it's the wrong way to fix it), and I'd like to understand why, since you've obviously thought about it a bunch. Thanks, Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners