From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA30392; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:18:38 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA30128 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:18:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id h53IIYT02840 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:18:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 23225 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 18:18:33 -0000 Received: from arda.pair.com (HELO checkerdell.d6.com) (209.68.1.133) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2003 18:18:33 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.1.133 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030603111046.03ec9bd8@localhost> X-Sender: checker@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 11:12:29 -0700 To: Michal Moskal From: Chris Hecker Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects Cc: John Max Skaller , caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20030603101338.GA12640@roke.freak> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030602171041.045da898@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030517192812.033d9040@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030602171041.045da898@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam: no; 0.00; hecker:01 checker:01 caml-list:01 cmx:01 checksum:01 compiler:01 chris:01 ocaml:01 it'd:01 compile:02 external:03 maybe:06 shell:08 naive:08 something:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >Maybe try simple shell script to do that? Something like >move-if-changed. This should work, and you could report how much it >helps. I think the cmi/cmx files have a checksum/timestamp already in them that's unique to a compile, so the naive external checksum won't work (this is supposition on my part, though, based on the error messages since I haven't looked at it yet). I think it'd have to be smart about things, and at that point it might be easier just to put it in the compiler to test it. Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners