From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch>
To: Jeffrey Loren Shaw <shawjef3@msu.edu>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] possible way to improve "lazy"
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4000A41B-9DE0-42A5-A25B-44F98F7D27DD@epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HTjPH-00082g-6M@sys25.mail.msu.edu>
Le 20 mars 07 à 19:50, Jeffrey Loren Shaw a écrit :
> Please consider this suggestion for an improvement of how caml
> handles lazy evaluation.
At a certain point there was this discussion [1], but I guess the
subsequent proposal never materialized because of tricky issues.
Daniel
[1] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/
2004/07/2461a873d5d45c22fef8816d4fe08d6b.fr.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-20 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-20 18:50 Jeffrey Loren Shaw
2007-03-20 21:53 ` Zheng Li
2007-03-20 23:39 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2007-03-21 1:06 ` [Caml-list] " Jeffrey Loren Shaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4000A41B-9DE0-42A5-A25B-44F98F7D27DD@epfl.ch \
--to=daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=shawjef3@msu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).