From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA19879; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:44:13 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA19348 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:44:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.dcs.qmul.ac.uk (vicar.dcs.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.88.163]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0THiBv23683 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:44:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from xenografia.plus.com ([212.159.85.26] helo=dcs.qmul.ac.uk) by mail.dcs.qmul.ac.uk with asmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1AmGD5-0004rv-B3; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:44:11 +0000 Message-ID: <40194644.9060308@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:43:32 +0000 From: Martin Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Rossberg , The Trade Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and concurrency References: <20040127063230.GA12482@inv_machine> <200401282326.i0SNQntl004612@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com> <97908806-5238-11D8-8975-000393B8133A@wetware.com> <4018E282.2040404@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> <401930C6.8060907@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> <40193B59.9050700@ps.uni-sb.de> In-Reply-To: <40193B59.9050700@ps.uni-sb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-User: martinb X-clamav-result: clean (1AmGD5-0004rv-B3) X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 closures:01 closures:01 java's:01 ocaml's:01 ocaml:01 arrow:95 maybe:06 consequence:07 i'm:07 function:09 rather:09 lack:09 lack:09 something:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > And even more so due to the lack of real closures, wouldn't you say that the lack of real closures is a consequence of java's lack of a proper function space arrow, rather than a separate issue? i don't see how you could have ocaml's full ---> without real closures, but maybe i'm missing something. martin ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners