From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA23311; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:04 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA18623 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp.zeuxis.net (zeuxis.net1.nerim.net [62.212.97.193]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id h9KGo2113262 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 6498 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 16:50:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.zeuxis.home (HELO zeuxis.net) (www@127.0.0.1) by localhost.zeuxis.home with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 16:50:01 -0000 Received: from 134.157.116.130 (SquirrelMail authenticated user greg) by webmail.zeuxis.net with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40848.134.157.116.130.1066668601.squirrel@webmail.zeuxis.net> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ipv6, any news? From: "Gregoire HENRY" To: In-Reply-To: <20031020151129.B13138@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20031020151129.B13138@pauillac.inria.fr> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , , Reply-To: gregoire.henry@pps.jussieu.fr X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 gregoire:01 gregoire:01 3.06.:01 feedbacks:01 3.07:01 familiarity:01 api:01 api:01 ocaml-:01 sockets:01 unix:02 unix:02 module:03 differences:04 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hello, I've make some works this summer, trying to respect basic sockets RFC. It's based on Unix module from ocaml-3.06. http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~henry/ip6/socket6-20031020.tgz it's early works, but feedbacks would be nice. >> I'm wondering if there's any news on the ipv6 front. I understand >> that 3.07 has no support in it. I've been getting some complaints >> from users of my software looking for IPv6, and I'm wondering what >> other people are doing to provide such support. > > No IPv6 support yet. It would be a worthwhile addition, but I admit to > have no familiarity with the IPv6 API. I got the impression that there > are some variations on the IPv6 API among Unix systems, which would be > a pain, but I may be wrong. Basic API is now a standard, and i've test on FreeBSD and Linux. Indeed, i can see some differences in constant for socket options and DNS request : some are not defined on linux. hope it helps Gregoire Henry ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners