From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA13677; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:12:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA12447; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:12:11 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3O8CAYM027899; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:12:10 +0200 Received: from wanadoo.fr (AStrasbourg-207-1-11-137.w81-250.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.250.12.137]) by mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D5F00C0001F4; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:12:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <408A2221.9040601@wanadoo.fr> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:15:29 +0200 From: Matthieu BRUCHER User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxence Guesdon Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library References: <20040423185148.GA4434@excelhustler.com> <20040423195206.GA27257@tallman.kefka.frap.net> <20040423202342.GA5962@excelhustler.com> <20040423223611.33ef1c08@haddock.max.fr> <20040423211003.GD6783@excelhustler.com> <20040423231204.1576c96b@haddock.max.fr> <20040423231831.5510656c@haddock.max.fr> <20040423214606.GH6783@excelhustler.com> <20040423235809.2267e6c9@haddock.max.fr> In-Reply-To: <20040423235809.2267e6c9@haddock.max.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; matthieu:01 matthieu:01 caml-list:01 maxence:01 guesdon:01 personnally:01 extlib:01 refactor:01 caml:01 caml:01 lib:01 ecrivait:02 thread:02 e-mailing:96 buggy:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Maxence Guesdon wrote: >Dans son style inimitable, John Goerzen écrivait: > > > >>>Sorry, the real start of the whole discussion is here: >>>http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00091.html >>> >>> >>Got it. We seem to be e-mailing past each other a bit here. >> >>Anyway, I've been reading that thread and haven't really seen anyone >>defending the standard library yet. I found this message particularly >>compelling: >> >>http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00166.html >> >>And Xavier's reply: >> >>http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00171.html >> >>Which, if I may boil several pages down into a few characters, seems to >>say "We know it sucks, but don't have time to fix it quickly." That >>does not translate, in my mind, to "your complaints are invalid", which >>is what you seem to be saying. So I still don't understand where you're >>coming from. >> >> > >I'm not saying "your complaints are invalid", i'm just (personnally) >tired of always reading the same discussions again and again. > > > >>All of which, though, is somewhat beside the point. How are we going to >>*fix* it? >> >> > >Why not start by merging your lib with Extlib ? > >- m > > I'm not a well-known or simply good programmer, just my few cents, but if the library is that buggy, it is perhaps more useful to refactor some part of it ? -- Matthieu BRUCHER Etudiant en 3ème année à SUPELEC Option Information, Signaux, Mesures ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners