Re: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing?

[David Fox <david.fox@lindows.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1116 bytes --]

skaller wrote:

>On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 02:45, Eray Ozkural wrote:
>  
>
>>On Sunday 30 May 2004 14:47, you wrote:
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>What if we would like to generate bindings for a huge moving target like Qt or 
>>KDE libraries? 
>>    
>>
>
>Hehe .. that's a *small* target.
>
>http://felix.sourceforge.net/flxcc.html
>
>has a slightly larger target .. every library on your system :)
>
>Would you like to build a wrapper for Python? 
>
>recincdir /usr/local/include/python2.3
>exclude /usr/local/include/python2.3/pymactoolbox.h
>
>[the second line is because I'm not on a Mac ..]
>
>
>  
>

My guess is that the set of all C libraries on my system is smaller than 
the two C++ libraries Qt + KDE.  Anyway, Qt + KDE sure *feels* bigger...

-david


--

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the 
addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone 
the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, 
please advise the sender and delete the message.  Thank you.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1739 bytes --]