From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA12641; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:41:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13347 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:41:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rabelais.socialtools.net (rabelais.socialtools.net [81.2.94.243]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i577fDEV010432 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:41:13 +0200 Received: by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix, from userid 108) id AF6972333B; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:41:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from socialtools.net (chaucer.socialtools.net [81.2.94.242]) by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4A72333A; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:41:11 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <40C41C17.8030400@socialtools.net> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:41:11 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, fr, it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr Cc: skaller@users.sourceforge.net, caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing? References: <40800C10000A6ABC@mk-cpfrontend-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com> <200406062144.55004.exa@kablonet.com.tr> <1086554511.16811.651.camel@pelican.wigram> <200406070604.39686.exa@kablonet.com.tr> In-Reply-To: <200406070604.39686.exa@kablonet.com.tr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on rabelais.socialtools.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40C41C19.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 interfacing:01 eray:01 ozkural:01 bison:01 parser:02 parser:02 rewritten:02 wrote:03 efficient:05 scratch:06 benjamin:07 followed:92 think:11 haven't:12 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Eray Ozkural wrote: > g++ was still using the old bison thing; they were talking about writing a > parser from scratch. I haven't followed the developments lately, though. The C++ parser in g++ was rewritten as a handcrafted, top-down parser; I think work on it was completed last year or the year before. Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners